BBC Factual has announced its plan for a documentary examining the phenomenon of the “unvaccinated.” If the woefully inaccurate press release is anything to go by, this so-called documentary promises to be outrageous propaganda.
We are told that the COVID jabs are both safe an effective. Yet when we look at the evidence nothing could be further from the truth. Not only are they ineffective and dangerous they are unregulated experimental drugs which are designed to enslave humanity.
People seem to believe that vaccine trials have been conducted for the COVID 19 vaccines. This belief is not only wrong it could be dangerously wrong. There are no clinical trial that have been completed for any COVID 19 vaccine and those telling you that there are are spouting disinformation.
This is an open letter to people who call anyone who questions vaccines and “anti-vaxxer.” It is written in the fervent hope that we can reach a mutial understanding and respect one another’s views.
In Part two we look at the extensive global network behind the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Though they claim to be a non governmental organisation, as we will see, they are actually representatives of the emerging global government.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate have declared themselves to be the arbiters of all truth. But how has this happened, where does this supremacists mindset come from and what does this mean fro our supposedly free and open democracy?
Anti-rationalists think that anyone who questions any aspect of vaccines is an anti-vaxxer. What are anti-rationalists and what do they believe? Is there any reason to question vaccine efficacy and safety?
In Part 2 we look at the powerful forces apparently obstructing the trials of chloroquine as a potential preventative treatment for COVID 19. We consider the competing commercial forces possibly influencing this strange sequence of harmful events.
Chloroquine has emerged as possibly the best preventative treatment for COVID 19. Yet many in authority have seemingly been resistant to trialling it . In Part 1 of this two part series we look at the evidence suggesting trials would be a good idea and ask why the response has been so slow.
We look at the evidence of systemic regulatory failures of vaccines in Part 4. What influence does profit have on decision making and what evidence is there that some vaccines are both unnecessary and unsafe?