Belief in conspiracy theory is said to be driven by an underlying psychology that verges on a mental health problem. This er…. idea emanates from experimental psychology and all of it is totally ridiculous.
In Part 2 we discuss how the conspiracy theory label is applied by the so-called epistemic authorities, and notably the legacy media, as a a propaganda tool. We look at recent examples and witness how the label functions.
Conspiracy theory is not what you are told it is and conspiracy theorists are not who you are told they are. I explore the disinformation that has coalesced to produce the conspiracy theory propaganda label.
UN-ism is the new McCarthyism. It seeks to persecute, censor, spread disinformation, propagandise and prosecute. Discover UN-ism here.
Disaster troll is the dehumanising term the BBC’s special social media and disinformation correspondent, Marianna Spring, uses to attack investigative researcher and author Richard D. Hall. The BBC is waging a propaganda and disinformation campaign.
9/11 truth has somehow become a matter of opinion. This cannot be the case because it defies logic, knowledge, evidence and reason. What does this false belief tell us about society 20 years after that fateful day?
The label of “Conspiracy Theorist” is used today to describe pretty much everyone who challenges the preferred narratives, policies and actions of the State. But how did this term become weaponised and is what we are told about those labelled with it plausible?
Conspiracy theory has become a dirty term. It suggests people called conspiracy theorists believe all manner of falsehoods. They are dangerous subversives or complete idiots (one of the two.) But what if conspiracy theory is true. What can we glean from this world view.
Consopiracy theory is a consequence of warped psychology according to recent academic research from a team of psychologists at the University . We explore the numerous logical fallacies within this flawed pseudoscience and ask if it is the researchers own psychological problems which underpins it.
Many people struggle to accept the New World Order project and simply reject any argument highlighting it as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ People who do understand it generally came to the realisation through their own research. So, if we want people to realise the truth, how do we encourage them to reject the mainstream media and think for themselves. In this post I argue that 9/11 is the possible key.