ITT Video

A collection of video’s created by Iain Davis. Simply click on the thumbnail to watch the video in glorious technicolor (apart from the black and white bits.)


James Corbett and I discuss how Britain is reacting to the coronavirus madness. We talk about COVID-19, the Coronavirus Act and other legislative nightmares, the statistical chicanery that is perpetuating this crisis, and how people across the UK and around the world are reacting to the new normal.

In the video I said the Care Quality Commission (CQC) had oversight of all social care but less so over health care. This wasn’t accurate. The CQC have oversight over all health and social care. The point I failed to make in the my conversation with James was that when I said the provision doesn’t include nursing homes I was referring to the gathering of statistics not their regulatory function. I did not make this distinction clear and my statement was misleading in this regard.

Operation Gladio was a secret NATO plan to perpetrate a series of false flag terror attacks to undermine the possible threat of communism in Europe. Revealed in a series of court cases in the mid 1980’s and officially declared in both the Italian and European parliaments in the early 1990’s, the disclosure of Operation Gladio proves that government have committed acts of terrorism against their own populations.

Many people today believe this policy of state sponsored terrorism continues. Often seen as a “conspiracy theory,” those who find this suggestion impossible to contemplate may understand why people suspect this possibility if they familiarise themselves with Operation Gladio.

Skripal Salisbury Chemical Weapons Attack 2018. An Investigation (2019 Update.) This video explores the nonsense that passes as the official narrative of 2018 Salisbury chemical weapons attack. T has been updated to include recent revelations about Colonel Alison McCourt. Using stock news footage of the Skripal poisoning and mainstream media reports about the supposed Salisbury attack, we consider, with tongue firmly in cheek, if what we are told about the UK chemical weapons attack is remotely plausible.

On March 4th 2018 Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia Skripal were allegedly poisoned with the nerve agent Novichok by two suggested Russian GRU agents. Both Sergei and Yulia thankfully recovered, as did PC Nick Bailey who was also contaminated. However, the British government maintained that Novichok was the most deadly nerve agent ever created. 5 times more Deadly than VX and 8 times more deadly than Sarin. Scientists at Porton Down stated that there was no known antidote. The Skripal’s recovery is therefore just one of the many aspects of the official government narrative that makes no sense whatsoever.

The lack of evidence about the Skripal’s movements in Salisbury, the bizaar tale of how the two GRU agents discarded the Novichok and its later discovery by Charlie Rowley. The sad demise of Rowley’s partner Dawn Sturgess following first response that did not identify the presence of Novichok. The odd route taken by the alleged assassins and their seeming willingness both to leave evidence at the scene of the crime and remain at the crime scene for unfathomable and totally unnecessary reasons.

Hopefully amusing at times but based upon the available evidence I hope you find Skripal – An Investigation a worthwhile watch.

In this report we see how a False Flag attack was created in Iraq in 2016 then follow how this fake news was reported to the World by Associated Press. The story is then picked up by major MSM outlets, like the Daily Mail in the UK, and reported as if it were real. This fake news propaganda is then used to promote public support for war and conflict, in this case, in the Middle East.

This is standard procedure for the MSM who are the propaganda wing for the global military industrial and intelligence complex.

 

The Western military industrial intelligence establishment has a long standing relationship with various Islamist extremist groups stemming back over at least half a century.

Prior to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, in 1979, President Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski was the key architect of a plan to arm the Afghan Mujaheddin in what would later be known as ‘Operation Cyclone.’

Thus began the modern era of cooperation between the Western powers, predominantly the U.S and the UK, and various Islamist extremist groups that has continued to this day. This important Sky News report from the early 1990’s shows how these Islamist Extremists were used in Europe during the Bosnian war.

The New World Order is a thing. A definite concept that has different meanings for different people.

For globalists and world leaders the New World Order means the promise of centralised power and a single point of control of all the world’s resources. Finally extricating themselves from any semblance of democratic oversight, freeing them to do whatever they like with no risk and no possibility of anyone ever interfering in their plans again.

For the people who understand the long, well documented history of the New World Order, from the will of Cecil Rhodes, through the transatlantic partnership of deep state think tanks and policy advisors, to the establishment of federalist super states and global decision making bodies, the New World Order appears to be the very worst from of government lead by the very worst individuals.

For everyone else the New World Order is an antisemitic
conspiracy theory which insists that there is a Jewish plot to enslave humanity. They have been firmly given this delusional idea by the world’s controlled mainstream media and compliant scholars, in order to make sure that they never actually look at the evidence which clearly demonstrates what the New World Order really is.

This tongue in cheek video explores how that mythology has been created as a deception to hide reality.

The Online Harms White Paper was released by the UK state on 08/04/2019. The state claims that it is all about ‘keeping us safe’ online and especially keeping children safe online. Which is a very laudable objective. Who could argue with that?

The problem is that the Online Harms White Paper effectively establishes the legal framework for the censorship of the Internet and takes a sledge hammer to any notion that we have free speech, or a democracy, in the UK.

It was made clear in the Queens speech at the state opening of Parliament that all parties are committed to this censorship. It is precisely the kind of proposed legislation you would expect to see from a dictatorship. If it passes into law, it will create one in the UK. No matter who you vote for.

The Western MSM reporting of the violence in Syria is best described as the Syrian conflict deception. Nothing we have been told about the conflict in Syria is true. The origins of the conflict aren’t as we led to believe, it’s precursors are radically different from what we’ve been told; the nature of the conflict was not a ‘civil war’ as our media have tried to convince us and many of the events during the conflicted have been misreported, distorted or have simply been ‘fake news.’

We look at the evidence revealing the deception. It shows the plan for ‘regime’ change in Syria was at least a decade old and was yet another attempt by the West to install the government of its choice in the country. The Testimony of General’s Wesley Clarke and former French Foreign minister Roland Dumas makes the long standing Anglo-American plan to oust the Ba’ath party from power clear.

Further testimony from Major General Anwar Al Eshki show that the Saudi’s were arming militants in the al Omari Mosque in Deraa where the violence began. This corroborated SAA claims that the violence did not erupt simply because they opened fire on unarmed protestors but rather because they were engaged in a gun battle with militant groups already in place. It is also clear, according to the testimony of General Michael T. Flynn, that the U.S administration made a ‘wilful decision’ to arm Islamist groups inside Syria in the full knowlwedge that this would likely lead to the creation of a ‘Salafist principality. Islamic State in other words.

Recently the Gaza Shooting of unarmed civilian protestors saw the killing of 58 and life changing injuries inflicted upon more than 1,200 protestors by soldiers of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF.) The response by the the British Government of Theresa May reveals the disgusting degree of hypocrisy our political establishment blithely offers us.

The Evidence was clear and unequivocal. Israeli forces had absolutely no justification whatsoever to open fire with live ammunition on these people. The Gaza shooting was an unprovoked massacre of civilians by the IDF, there is a wealth of corroborating evidence to prove the fact. Moreover it is clear that unarmed Palestinian protestors were targeted by IDF snipers with the evident objective of killing them. Many were killed hundreds of meters away from the fence, a high number were shot in the back, the live ammunition used in the Gaza Shooting (7.62mm rounds) was designed to inflict the most severe injuries possible (in the absence of death) and there was no realistic threat to IDF forces and certainly none to Israeli civilians, who weren’t even present. 8 Children were among the 58 murdered Palestinians.

The stark contrast between the British Governments response to the proven actions of the Israel and the alleged actions of Syria in Douma, only a month earlier, reveal the reality of the British Government’s supposed moral indignation. Hypocrisy barely describes it.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference in 2018, the new European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair discuss what appears to be an EU policy commitment to military operations in the Sahel region of Africa.

There has been much speculation about why the EU would want to do this. A possible reason may be because they know food production in the Northern hemisphere is going to be impacted by the Grand Solar Minimum and the Sahel will be a major food production region for the world.

However, both Russia and China are already heavily committed to the region and NATO have recently shown an interest. Any EU military action in the Sahel could potentially lead to confrontation between the major powers.

The Truth about Brexit isn’t easy to accept. Brexit has been a deception to hide an unpalatable reality.

On February 17th 2018, speaking about Defence and security at the Munich Security Conference, regardless of Brexit, UK Prime Minister Theresa May stated that the UK was ‘unconditionally’ committed to EU defence.

On February 15th 2019 Tony Blair enjoyed being interviewed before a compliant audience at University of Technology, in Munich. During his speech he spoke about EU Defence Union. He acknowledged that the British people wouldn’t like it if they discovered the truth. Therefore, he suggested this should be ‘handled carefully.’ Deception in other words.

The same day the High Representative of the European Union Federica Mogherini spoke about how the EU have now created EU Defence Union as a commitment to the New World Order. Mogherini has worked in close cooperation with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. Despite claims by some, EU Defence Union does not undermine NATO. It is a joint plan with NATO.

While the British People were deliberately distracted by the illusion they could ever leave the EU, the EU (including the UK) have completed total Defence Union. If the British people new the nations ability to defend its sovereignty, had been given away, in their entirety, to the central command and control of the EU, leaving the EU would be a foregone conclusion.

This is why the Brexit vote was offered in the first place. It is all a monumental deception by those who are determined to build the New World Order.

Made in February 2019, while Theresa May was the UK Prime Minister, this video accurately predicted what would happen with the Brexit withdrawal deal. It is now that the new Prime Minister Boris Johnson withdrawala agreement ‘deal’ is practically identical to May’s. It is much worse than no deal and, despite saying “no deal was better than a bad deal,” the UK Parliament have connived to ensure May/Johnson’s bad deal is far worse than a no deal Brexit while, at the same time, removing the option of leaving the EU with no deal.

Whether Parliament extends Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (Brexit not happening), accepts May/Johnson’s Brexit deal (Brexit not happening) or initiates a second referendum, where the choice is between May/Johnson’s deal or remain (Brexit not happening,) it is clear the UK is not going to leave the EU.

The depth of the betrayal was described succinctly by Gina Miller, prominent remainer, speaking on the BBC’s Question Time. What Gina outlined was how terrible May’s deal is. For Brexit / Lexit voters, it is worse than staying in the EU. While the UK remains subject to EU laws, economic and trade regulations it gives away all say in decision making. Even for the staunchest leave voter May’s Brexit deal is far worse than remain.

This is no accident. Rather than make a clean break from the EU and then negotiate trade arrangements, the UK political establishment have colluded to make leaving the EU a practical impossibility. The UK was never going to leave the EU. Voting is utterly pointless if you vote the ‘wrong way.’

Anthropogenic Climate Change sceptic Tony Heller demonstrates how and why he believes the climate change data has been manipulated to decrease historic temperatures and increase modern measurements. He asks why NOAA and NASA would have done this. This video is important in my view as it clearly shows how the ‘evidence’ substantiated the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis is faked.

This cooling of the past a warming of the present within data sets is so prolific it is clear that the science alone does not support the AGW hypothesis unless the data is ‘adjusted.’

 

In December 2018, only a couple of months after starting her one girl global protest , Greta Thunberg somehow found herself speaking at the COP24 United Nations Climate Summit in Poland.

The media reported how she had told world leaders what they needed to do. The mainstream media told us how world leaders really took her message to heart. In this video we look at the reality behind the story.

Did Greta really tell world leaders what they needed to do? Watch to find out.