The so called “awakening”, that many in the “truther” movement are convinced is imminent, is, I suggest, nowhere in sight. Witness (as admittedly inconclusive evidence) John Nicolson on the BBC Andrew Marr program this morning (18/12/2016.) In a brief roundup some of the major news stories of 2016 the guests were asked to choose an[…]
The underhand establishment campaign of disinformation and lies being waged against Jeremy Corbyn beggars belief. I am fairly clear in my own mind why this happening and write my opinion here.
Many people struggle to accept the New World Order project and simply reject any argument highlighting it as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ People who do understand it generally came to the realisation through their own research. So, if we want people to realise the truth, how do we encourage them to reject the mainstream media and think for themselves. In this post I argue that 9/11 is the possible key.
To many, the idea that 9/11 was an example of conspiracy theory in action is a no brainer. However others think that these so called “conspiracy theorists” are, at best, idiots but also probably communists and terrosit sympathisers who want to destroy democracy and the western way of life. So why do these people believe that the official narrative of 9/11 doesn’t add up?
Some awareness of geopolitics is a central tenet of many peoples co called conspiracy theories. But with the term having such a pejorative meaning these days should people who are concerned about geopolitics distance themselves from it? Well in order to understand if that’s the case you firstly need to have an idea about what geopolitics are and why the term conspiracy theory has become a description for those widely perceived as being fucking mental.
By saying that we believe in evolution are we suggesting there is an alternative explanation? Do we believe the Earth is 4.54 billion years old or is it simply a fact. By using our language cautiously are we allowing others with unproven, subjective ideologies the opportunity to masquerade faith as science. I suggest that we can both change the nature of the debate and future understanding if we are more confident instating evidential fact.
What is a secular society? Many claim it is a blueprint for religious oppression and a ploy by an atheist liberal elite to undermine democracy. But is this really the case? Does secularism favour atheism of religious faith? Is it an attempt to redefine society by rendering faith an abomination? To answer this we need to look at what secularism does and does not stand for. What are it’s defining principles.
If you’ve ever asked how can I make a difference in the world then this post will reveal the two steps you need to take in order to make a positive change. By making changes in our own lives and moving towards the things that are important to us we can start to make a change that matters.
In Part 4 of this 4 part series we look at the difference between micro and macro economics and the problems that traditional analysis overlooks. By failing to account or he activities of the top 1% economic elite and by failing to understand the monetary system we show why classical micro and macro economic analysis is flawed.
Part 3 of 4: the Difference Between Micro and Macro Economics – We look at macro economics in more detail and consider the impact of GDP, inflation and unemployment upon an economic system. We also start to look at potential pitfalls with this model.